Sample Charting Analysis for Unified Patents PATROLL
□ Patent 1 (Target): US7233684B2
□ Patent 2 (Prior Art): AU2002253318A1
Both patents involve capturing images, with Patent 1 capturing a single image of a scene and Patent 2 capturing multiple images of a subject. In both cases, the image capture process is central to the methods disclosed in the patents.
Additionally, both patents involve collecting information during the process. Patent 1 focuses on collecting affective information, such as physiological data, at the time of image capture, while Patent 2 involves making one or more measurements or observations of the subject. While the types of information collected are different, the underlying concept of collecting information related to the subject or user during the process is present in both patents.
Furthermore, both patents involve analyzing the collected information. Patent 1 interprets the collected physiological information to determine the relative degree of importance of the scene image, while Patent 2 employs an automatic machine classification technique to analyze the collected data and output information relating to the psychology of the subject. Although the methods of analysis and their outcomes are different, both patents involve analyzing the collected information to obtain a better understanding of the subject or user.
Considering these similarities, it can be argued that Patent 2 may be an anticipating prior art of Patent 1. The central concepts of image capture, information collection, and information analysis are present in both patents, suggesting that Patent 2's disclosure could have potentially anticipated the inventions claimed in Patent 1. As a result, the validity of Patent 1 could be challenged based on the existence of Patent 2 as prior art.
References
1.
Apex Standards Website
2.
Apex Standards Pseudo Claim Charting
3.
Apex Standards Pseudo Claim Construction
4.
Apex Standards Domain-specific GPT, sample prompts and results